The Squirrels Here Aren’t Real

Satire

Claire Herquet, Editor-In-Chief

Three years at La Salle so far have taught me many valuable lessons. I’ve learned how to write on a deadline week-to-week, survive an 8 a.m. class commuting from New Jersey, juggle work-life balance as a student-athlete, and so much more. But above all else, I have learned one undeniable truth: the squirrels run this campus.

I understand the seriousness of this allegation. I did not arrive at this conclusion lightly. This is the result of years of observation, tons of serious conversations with my colleagues, and dozens of suspicious encounters (one particularly intimidating squirrel outside Hayman Hall that looked at me like it knew my GPA).

The evidence is overwhelming. At the very least, they are not operating under the same rules as normal squirrels.

According to wildlife experts, squirrels are supposed to have a natural fear of humans and avoid potential threats. However, urban squirrels often become habituated to people, meaning they learn that humans are not particularly dangerous and begin acting more boldly.

That explains some things.

It does not explain what is happening at La Salle.

Most squirrels, when approached, will make a reasonable life decision. They will run away, climb a tree, and/or create distance.

Squirrels at 20th and Olney do none of these things.

Instead, they stare. You know the stare. They’re conducting performance reviews.

You’re walking to class, already late because you convinced yourself five more minutes of sleep would improve your morning (it barely ever does), and suddenly there is a brown, fuzzy fella standing directly in your path.

Not near your path.

Not adjacent to your path.

They post-up directly in it.

I’ve watched innocent students completely alter their walking pathway because a squirrel was standing in the middle of the sidewalk with an attitude problem. They weren’t attacking or chasing anyone – just existing aggressively.

It remains exactly where it is because it knows you will be the one to go around.

And you do.

Every single time.

At this point, the squirrels definitely view the students here as the lesser species. Scientists have found that squirrels living around people often become more tolerant of human activity and allow humans to get much closer than their counterparts. This explains tolerance, but not arrogance.

I regularly see squirrels positioned throughout campus as if they’re working shifts. During the day, there are usually a few by the Student Union, always a couple around Connelly Library, and near the benches outside John E. Glaser Arena. I’ve seen all of them in the same place at once, which suggests an organizational structure. One can never assume, but these locations might be part of a whole coordinated surveillance operation.

I don’t think we should call them wildlife anymore—they’re getting too advanced. In reality, La Salle University might be a squirrel-controlled municipality, and we’ve been just passing through it this whole time. Frankly, we should stop pretending otherwise.

The squirrels don’t need your meal swipes or your tuition money. They don’t even need your respect anymore; they already have it.

If you don’t believe me, try staring at one for longer than five seconds. You’ll be the first to look away. If you’ve ever altered your route because a squirrel looked too confident, you’re already living under their rule.

I know I am.

If this article suddenly disappears soon, please understand that I probably said too much. The squirrels have ears and eyes everywhere—you know how administrators can get.

Kevin Warsh nominated as next Federal Reserve Chair

Business

Hailey Whitlock, Staff Writer

The last few months in the economic sector have been fraught with tension as President Trump frequently criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell due to his disagreements pertaining to the rate of interest cuts. The chair, appointed by Trump himself, has faced increased scrutiny from the executive branch, making it evident that Powell’s term would not be renewed in 2026. As such, speculation began about who the president would nominate to lead the Federal Reserve when Powell’s term expires in May of 2026. 

On Jan. 30, 2026, President Trump announced his decision: Kevin Warsh. Warsh, who served on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors during Bush’s presidency, is no stranger to economic crises. During his previous term on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, Warsh served from 2006 to 2011, overlapping with the Great Recession of 2008. Under the leadership of chair 

Ben Bernanke, he, along with other key Federal Reserve officials, took on the daunting task of assisting in managing rates during a very challenging economic time for the country. 

In fact, due to his experience during the Great Recession, Warsh was a top contender for the role of the chair of the Federal Reserve during President Trump’s first term. Instead, the president chose Powell; per ABC News, he described Powell at the time of the 2017 appointment as a “consensus builder” who “understands what it takes for the economy to grow.” 

However, now Trump saves the praise for Warsh, posting on social media per AP News: “I have known Kevin for a long period of time, and have no doubt he will go down as one of the GREAT Fed Chairmen, maybe the best. On top of everything else, he is ‘central casting,’ and he will never let you down.” 

He is not the only one supportive of Warsh; as reported on the official White House webpage, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Chairman Tim Scott penned, “As a former Federal Reserve Governor, Kevin has deep knowledge of markets and monetary policy that will be essential in this role. Federal Reserve independence remains paramount, and I am confident Kevin will work to instill confidence and credibility in the Fed’s monetary policy.” 

Despite the praise, many wonder at the choice of Warsh; Warsh has been known to be a “hawk” when it comes to interest rates, preferring higher interest rates to slow inflation. This perspective, illustrated throughout his time on the Federal Reserve, is in direct contradiction to the preferred methods of the president calling into question why the president would pick a chair for the Federal Reserve who has proven himself to be so diametrically opposed to his preferred method. In recent years, Warsh has begun making statements more in line with cutting interest rates, as the president launched his search for the next Federal Reserve chair. Despite past evidence, Trump calmly stated that Warsh does want to cut interest rates. Analysts at Renaissance Macro Research put it simply: “Kevin Warsh has been a monetary policy hawk his entire career and most importantly during a time when the labor markets fell out of bed. His dovishness stems from convenience. The President risks getting duped.” This perspective holds that Warsh has changed his public view of interest rates to align with what the president is looking for, and will likely return to his views if selected. 

Yet to see if such a prediction is accurate, the nomination must be confirmed by the Senate. Senator Tillis, a member of the banking committee that is called to consider the nomination, has stated that he will oppose the nomination until a Justice Department investigation pertaining to Powell is resolved. It is speculated that the investigation has political motives and is a way for the president to attempt to pressure the chair into lowering rates. Per AP News, Tillis wrote that Warsh is a “qualified nominee,” yet emphasized that “protecting the independence of the Federal Reserve from political interference or legal intimidation is non-negotiable.” It is speculated that without Tillis’ support, the confirmation will not be passed. However, Trump responded by stating per ABC News, “If he doesn’t approve, we’ll just have to wait until somebody comes in who will approve it,” alluding to the end of Tillis’ term early next year.