No Kings Protest

Commentary

Nathalia Peralta D., Staff Writer 

Five million demonstrators attended the first “No Kings” protests on June 14, 2025, and almost seven million showed up to the second round of rallies on Oct. 18, 2025. Crowds gathered in cities across the United States, as well as overseas, to protest President Donald Trump’s administration and call for the defense of First Amendment rights. Many protesters from Los Angeles to New York as well as Chicago, Washington D.C. and Austin, Texas, flooded the streets chanting, marching and waving homemade signs that proclaimed “We want all of the government to work” and “Make America Good Again.” 

At the protests, speeches and music blared, some even donned Halloween costumes in the cross-country rallies that demanded protection of all Constitutional Rights, many claiming they are under attack by the Trump administration. Politicians in support encouraged the rallies and spoke up, telling people to keep fighting for democracy.  Senators Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Chris Murphy of Connecticut were a few notable politicians speaking out. Even Bill Nye, the beloved children’s show host, commented, “They do not promote the progress of science. They suppress it, to the detriment of our health, well-being, and international competitiveness,” he said. “It is a formula for failure.” 

Many of the fired U.S. Agency for International Development workers also joined the No Kings Protest at the capital, including Amanda Nature. Nature, 41, of Washington told NBC News, “The common adage is that 50% of the country voted for this. But 50% of the country didn’t vote for a government shutdown and the dismantlement of the government and services that people rely on.”

High-profile clashes between residents and federal immigration authorities in Chicago have unfolded in recent weeks. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker shared a defiant speech. He called out Trump and Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller for “coming for the immigrants, and for Black and brown people, and for LGBTQ people and for their political opponents.” 

“History will judge us by where we choose to stand right now, today. Future generations will ask: ‘What did we do when fellow human beings faced persecution? When our rights were being abridged? When our Constitution was under attack?” Pritzker asked. “They’ll want to know whether we stood up or we stayed silent.” 

Many people are speaking up. There are plenty of people willing to stand up, defy and go against their government because they believe in freedom. Many people believe that if we all stay silent, we are giving in to a system of power that will only benefit the wealthy, leaving us all to fend for ourselves. That is not what America is, and we shouldn’t let it get to that point. 

This is just the beginning and a preview of what is to come in the following months. People are fed up, scared and unsure of what this government has for them, but even so, they stand front and center to protect their rights and freedoms before it’s too late. Senator Elizabeth Warren addressed thousands at the Boston Common, stating, “Standing up to a wannabe dictator? That is patriotism. Peacefully protesting to protect our democracy? That is patriotism!” While many protests have been peaceful and without incident, some leaders, including those in Texas, have said they would mobilize the National Guard to monitor for potential unrest. 

No Kings Day sign via Wikicommons

The Modern Writer 

Commentary

Sean Musial, Editor 

A good portion of people in the world consider writing a dying artform and a difficult field to get into when compared to other occupations. Whether it’s because of AI or overly saturated forms of content, writing is hard for any newcomer to gain mass recognition. Journalists, authors and screenwriters can spend years pouring their hearts and souls into something they’re passionate about to their very core with no results to back it up. The art of writing is something I will strive to improve day by day, until one day the rest of the world can eventually understand the way I shape the artform into my own worlds and stories. 

It’s a lonely process that involves picking apart ideas in your head to properly convey to the reader what you’re trying to say. Journalists take factual evidence they gather through interviews, research and fact-checking to tell the truth. Authors can take a couple of weeks or even years writing their book depending on the length, genre, scheduling and personal conflicts. Screenwriting, similar to authors, is a delicate process that can also take days to even years in this form to complete. 

Each of the three is a daunting task. It’s an accumulation of patience, persistence, poignancy and proofreading until you are comfortable with the final product. That’s part of the problem that AI has been creating. With this newly formed technology that is still advancing, it can practically minimize the hard work of an individual that takes weeks to complete and instead do it in seconds depending on the prompt you give it. The algorithm spits out a robotic word-for-word document on what you wanted with no emotional depth or human touch to it— yet people eat it up and pass it off as their own work. This is killing not only careers, but it’s jeopardizing creativity. Thoughts and words are coming from a robot, not people. 

Writing is something that has been engraved in me since I was a kid. The art that comes with telling a story, whether it’s movies or books, is something I am extremely passionate about. It started with me spending hours in my room studying what it means to convey a message to a reader. I still find random notebooks lying around my room and house filled with story concepts and cartoonish characters that I would draw. 

As I got older and started to understand where this was coming from, it became a more structured process, one that was less sporadic. The story concepts started to flow easier with more efficient planning. I planned throughout most of high school the overall ideas I wanted to convey out into the world. My friends would look over my shoulder curiously trying to figure out what I was doing. I explained it to them the best I could: I want to write books and movies for a living. When senior year came around, I got most primary concepts out of the way. I began to write even more.

I started my first book and my first pilot episode for a different story (which I later decided to turn into a book rather than a TV show). The things I write about have a wide range. The genres I tackle are as follows: coming-of-age, crime, sci-fi, fantasy, satire, dark comedy, war, historical fiction, etc. A goal of mine is to try and tackle all types by putting my own Northeast Philly/Sean Musial twang into it. 

As I’m getting older and still have this dream, continuing to try to get there, it’s difficult. I ask myself all the time, “Do I self-publish or keep on trying to get in touch with major publishing companies?” For now, I’m still aiming to get my work published by a professional publisher. I’ve been focusing on school lately but for the next couple of months, I’m going to get back in the race to get in touch with these companies. I continue to write for now, as I am starting three new books since I finished the manuscript of my first book. 

I’m an ambitious and optimistic guy. I know if it doesn’t work for me in the next couple of years, or even a decade, I’ll continue to pursue it. “Obsession beats talents” is something I heard a long time ago. You might be pretty good at something, but you’re not the best at it; yet, if I am as “obsessed” with writing as I was when I was a kid, that obsession could be a defining factor that truly gets me there some day. 

If you think writing is for you, in any type of field, go for it. Don’t listen to what others might have to say about it. Yes, there are definitely some road blocks in the way, but that should not stop the pursuit. Take me for example: I write every single day and will continue to do so. Write what you want to write about. Who knows, maybe one day the world will have the pleasure of seeing your work out there.

Person Holding Orange Pen via Pexels

Halloween fun in Philadelphia 

Commentary

Allison Ringsdorf, Editor 

We are in the swing of autumn now that it is mid-October, but if you are searching for some fun this Halloween season, then look no further than this article for ideas to spend your nights and weekends!  

Spooky Mini Golf 

Located in Franklin Square between Chinatown and Old City, Philly Mini Golf provides a scary twist. From Oct. 1 to Nov. 1 between the hours of 10 a.m. and 10 p.m., one can enjoy the season for a low price. Adults pay $15 and children are $12. Thursday through Sunday nights between 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. the Boo-zy Bar will be open for the 21 and older crowd. Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights are the busiest, so advance order tickets are required for those nights. Buying a ticket at the door will not be available. 

Manayunk Fall Fest 

If you are searching for wholesome fall fun, check out the Manayunk Fall Fest Saturday, Oct. 18 from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Here one will find local vendors and artisans, food trucks and a family-friendly atmosphere lined up along Main Street. The big event for the day will be a “Mac n’ Cheese Crawl,” which is a joint event with restaurants along Main Street. Check-in will be held at the Manayunk Welcome Center. Entry into the event will cost $25.  

Cityside Pumpkin Patch 

Cityside Pumpkin Patch offers a family friendly carnival atmosphere for the 21 and older crowd. For two-hour sessions, one can expect pumpkin smashing areas, carnival games, a ghost slingshot, face painting and opportunities alongside the scenic Delaware River. Important information regarding ticket times and fees are available on the website.  

Nightmare Before Tinsel 

Tinsel Bar, located in the Midtown Village of Center City, presents Nightmare Before Tinsel until Nov. 2. Tinsel, known for its eccentric Christmas decorations and themed drinks, takes on a spooky theme for the first month of its opening season. Craft cocktails are served in souvenir cups and the haunted artifacts say, “Don’t Touch.” Open from 4 p.m. to 12 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 4 p.m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday, this two-story experience supports local artisans who handcraft the decor.

Ghost Tours 

Philadelphia is known for its illustrious history. However, alongside the glory comes haunting baggage. Ghost tours of Philadelphia run well beyond Halloween and into late November depending on the group. Philadelphia Ghost Tours or Spirit of ‘76 Ghost Tours allow one to scratch the spooky itch without breaking the bank. For $24 each, one must pack their walking shoes, as the chilling tour of Philadelphia’s past extends over one hour.  

Dinos After Dark 

For museum lovers, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University provides a Halloween twist to the Dinos After Dark series. On select Friday evenings, the museum hosts pay-what-you-wish evenings from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. This Halloween happens to be a Friday; therefore, a creaky, crawly evening is in order. Music and the Dino Drafts Beer Garden are offered to liven up the mood. After 8:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m., Dinos after Dark turns into a 21 and older event with a $30 cover fee for non-members. Take the time to dance, participate in karaoke or enjoy dinosaurs after hours.

La Salle On Record Podcast: Episode 1

Commentary

Welcome to La Salle On Record, a new five-part series from WEXP Student Radio where senior Kyla Renegar sits down with members of the La Salle community to hear their stories, each focused on one of the five Lasallian values. The goal of this series is to delve into La Salle’s history, its mission, and learn more about what it really means to be Lasallian. In episode 1, Kyla had the chance to chat with Father Frank Berna about what it means to teach, preach, and live in the presence of God. Follow along with this series to hear more wisdom and hidden stories from the Lasallian community!

What Jimmy Kimmel’s censorship teaches Americans about their right to “free” speech

Commentary

Sam Klein, Editor

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly outlines that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” Over time, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has enacted various bylaws that prohibit speech in cases of obscenity, indecency and profanity in an attempt to protect the American people. Yet, one thing has always been certain since the Bill of Rights was officially ratified in 1791: the American people have a fundamental right to free speech. 

In an era of vastly polarized political parties, the allowance of free speech has only further divided the American people, whose diverse opinions run rampant on the Internet, social media sites and by word of mouth. Still, our ability to voice our opinions is what makes democracy stand strong, allowing for a united front even if our opinions are not uniform. However, our democracy is as strong as it is fragile; our confidence in our autonomy is slowly deteriorating, one act of government censorship at a time. 

Many journalists and media personalities are growing fearful of censorship following ABC’s decision to remove Jimmy Kimmel’s show off the air after his comments regarding the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. On Sept. 15, Kimmel discussed how divisive the country is while simultaneously criticizing Trump for deepening the divide, failing to release the Epstein files and ultimately targeting MAGA’s reaction to Kirk’s death.

Not only did Kimmel criticize MAGA’s response, but Trump’s minimal reaction to Kirk’s death as well. “This is not how an adult grieves the murder of somebody called a friend,” Kimmel said. “This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.”

Kimmel’s mention of Kirk’s murder sparked immediate controversy. Chair of the FCC Brendan Carr threatened to take action against ABC, and therefore Disney, if they did not act quickly. Succumbing to the pressure, ABC claimed Kimmel’s show would be taken off the air indefinitely. 

Yet a week later, ABC brought the show back.

In his opening monologue following the return of the show on Sept. 23, Kimmel said while choking back tears, “It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man. I don’t think the murderer who shot Charlie Kirk represents anyone. This was a sick person who believed violence was a solution and it isn’t, ever.” 

Kimmel then expressed his sympathy for Erica Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, and explained how her forgiveness of her late husband’s killer touched him deeply. Yet, in light of the events, Kimmel could not help but recognize the democratic importance of his censorship to the broader issue of regulating free speech. 

Kimmel mentions how in other foreign countries, namely Russia and the Middle East, talk show hosts would get thrown in jail, or potentially worse, for criticizing people in a position of power, which is why he considers himself lucky. Yet, Kimmel acknowledges that within our democratic system, any censorship of comedians by our government is simply “anti-American.” 

“[They] tried to coerce our affiliates who run our show in the cities you live in to take my show off the air. That’s not legal; that’s not American,” Kimmel said.

Trump himself was outraged about the return of Kimmel’s show, immediately taking his response to Truth Social by writing, “Why would they [ABC] want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive DEMOCRATIC GARBAGE.” 

ABC has not publicly responded to Trump’s post, yet as CNN states, it remains clear that the president cannot stand to be criticized night after night. 

Kimmel outlined the process of learning his show was being taken off the air while featured on fellow comedian Stephen Cobert’s talk show, The Late Show. Also an avid criticizer of Trump, Colbert is being taken off the air by CBS beginning in May of 2026 for “purely financial reasons,” yet fans are skeptical because the decision came after criticism of Trump and the show’s parent company, Paramount Global. 

The technicalities of which talk shows will continue to air are irrelevant, for the importance of censoring them at all remains the focus of many journalists who believe our democracy is threatened. Kimmel’s remarks on his Sept. 15 show, while potentially controversial in nature, did not break any FCC guidelines that would give the government the ability to restrict his speech. The issue then wasn’t the legality of Kimmel’s words, rather the dislike of conservative higher ups, like Carr and Trump, to be nationally criticized, furthermore pressuring corporations like ABC to act. 

Although Kimmel remains on the air, the question stands: How can we “Make America Great Again” if our government does not believe in upholding the principles established in our Constitution, and perhaps more importantly– What does government censorship mean for the future of our democracy?

Media Censorship via Pixabay

The pissed off American dream

Commentary

Sean Musial, Editor

The American Dream. A term first coined nearly 100 years ago by historian and writer, James Truslow Adams, in his 1931 bestselling book, The Epic of America. Though the phrase was initially conceived in the book, the concept has been around since the birth of our country. The idea is deeply rooted in the Declaration of Independence, with things that were written like “all men are created equal” and “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.

The original and more detailed meaning is the following: the belief that anyone can achieve success and prosperity through their hard work and determination, rather than social class or circumstances of birth. Back then, sure. It could be something attainable by any American citizen if they put the work in. In modern society, those notions of “social class” and “circumstances” are becoming blurred through different economic, social, internal and external means. The American Dream is pissed off and looking for a rewrite. 

Plenty of writers throughout history have written on the subject. With these myopic views and personal interpretations, the “Dream” has been seen in different lights. F. Scott Fitzgerald offered up a cynical look with The Great Gatsby by exploring themes of wealth, class and the pursuit of a materialistic version of it during the Jazz Age. The writer of Death of A Salesman, Arthur Miller, gave his audiences a ruinous critique of the concept, presenting an ordinary man’s spectacular failure. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck depicts it as a luxury that can be rarely affordable for those living in poverty.

These novels and plays are very early glimpses of what had come of The American Dream during the 1920s and 1930s. Even though it has been over 100 years since the mentioned books came out to the American public, the overall ideas portrayed have been present throughout the past century. The argument can be made that it is prevalent in modern society more than ever. 

The American Dream was supposed to be a promise… now it feels more like a punchline. When it was originally created, it was a less saturated and convoluted time. We live in a consumption culture now that has started to delude people into the certainty of what they can’t have. The illusion of mobility dangles in front of us like a carrot on a stick. We chase it endlessly, but the closer we get, the further it seems to move out of reach.

The crisis of identity comes into play through the uncertainty of someone not knowing if they’re doing too little or overdoing it. Anxiety towards that unknown path an individual takes often causes burnout. The disconnect between effort and reward breeds existential rage, making one question their hustle in a system that is already rigged against them. 

How can one truly “be themselves” in a culture that commodifies authenticity? Being yourself is pursuing your dream. It’s a part of your foundation no matter how little or grand that idea that you long for is. Many who have still opted to chase it have started to find themselves with a different kind of struggle. Different struggles like social media backlash are oftentimes being overlooked because of the recurring factor of oversaturated content.

For Gen Zers and Millennials, they seem to be dreaming differently. They are branching off from that “white-picket fence” but rather towards freedom from depth, asking the grand question of what it all means, and granting mental peace. Some reject that systematic repression completely. Many are the people who choose the van life, embrace anti-work or become digital nomads as they still long for their own sense of peace. 

This built-up anger isn’t a result of laziness or too much enlightenment, but it’s rather the result of a promise that has already been broken. We sometimes want something so badly that we can feel we can reach out and grab it. When we go to touch and nothing’s there, that’s when we start to get pissed off. It’s not unattainable. It just hasn’t reached that point yet. What happens when society loses its central myth? What replaces the Dream when belief collapses?

An argument can be made that it could turn us into a “copy and paste” society, meaning that each person will be identical then the person that came before or after them. An emotionless and predetermined life that is created for the higher-ups to rule over us at will for their own beneficial success. The anger we possess towards this idea that we won’t get to our overarching goal is sacred. It is a signal of life, resistance and the internal hunger for something real.

The success should be redefined and reimagined for it to stay alive out of what has come out of the modern world. It’s not accumulation but rather alignment. Yes, we accumulate knowledge, relationships and other things for the success of our dream to eventually become true. Letting everything align together like a jigsaw puzzle or a star constellation before you rush through it is what should feel more natural during the pursuit. It shouldn’t be consumption but rather connection. The connection with the ones closest to you and the connection with the audience you are trying to accumulate for the vision to inevitably come into fruition.

Community should come first over what is deemed your “competition.” As much as someone is the central driving force for the dream to come true, no one in history has done it without the help of others by their side. Mutual aid, collective care and decentering form the idea of the self-made man. Ego kills the dream even if you think it drives it. The dream could have never been a destination at all, but rather a mirror into one’s unconscious thoughts, feelings and hidden conflicts. That internal reflection evaluates your potential so it can bleed out into the real world. 

The American dream is pissed off… and maybe it should be. Maybe that anger is something more honest, more human. Maybe it’s a path towards a more enlightened tomorrow rather than the limited past that it came from. Choose the present over the nostalgia of the past because it keeps you from longing for what was rather than what is. We may not want the old dream back, but we can make that choice to dream differently.

Our dreams in life are what make us human beings. That yearning for an idea or plan that feels so far away, even through hard work and major perseverance. Pursue the dream. Live, breathe and sleep it. Getting pissed off when you’re not there yet is a natural response to something you want and can imagine so clearly; it’s like you can reach out to touch it. Dream big or go home.

PPEL San Diego Summer School

Commentary

Maya Martin, Editor

This past June, I had the wonderful opportunity to travel to San Diego for a Philosophy, Politics, Economics and Law (PPEL) Summer School. The program was through the University of Arizona’s Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, and took place on campus at the University of San Diego.

I was accompanied on the program by my fellow La Salle students, Allie Ringsdorf, Lawrence Manny, Gabby Fletcher and Kenny Lynch. We gathered for a four-day-long session with teachings from renowned professors, professionals and philosophers from across the country. The program graciously covered the cost of housing, food and the school itself.

Program Attendees via the University of Arizona’s Freedom Center

The purpose of the summer school was to explore foundational and contemporary questions about society, exchange and governance. Presenters shared their work and topics with us throughout the week on a variety of interdisciplinary issues. Two of my favorite presentations were “International Jurisdictions, Water, and the Internet” and “Schadenfreude Representation.”

The presentations given were extremely insightful and thought-provoking. Although we sat through about four presentations a day, each kept students engaged.

Additionally, during the program, students broke into groups of five and researched, organized and worked to present a project called the “Big Question Project.” The goal of this project was for groups to think of a burning question related to PPEL and reflect on its importance or significance.

My group won third place for our presentation on the question “How can privatized prisons be justified as a form of punishment?” The presentation served to speak about the history of private prisons and its interpretation through philosophical, political, economic and legal lenses.

Third Place Winners via the University of Arizona’s Freedom Center

Right before attending the summer school, local issues arose regarding Delaney Hall, an immigration detention center, in Newark, NJ. Being from New Jersey, these issues deeply affected my community and piqued my interest, so we stemmed the topic from there.

During our presentation, we talked about major issues occurring in private prisons, including discrimination by nationality, exploitation, cruel and unusual punishment, and non-disclosure issues.

Researching this topic was very interesting and opened my eyes to much more than I knew about private prisons. We learned through our research that, on average, inmates in privatized prisons make much less than inmates in public prisons. Additionally, while most public prisons offer free basic necessities, private prisons typically charge these items at an inflated cost.

Additional research also led us to the discovery of which companies support GeoGroup and CoreCiviC, the monopolies owning and profiting off of private prisons. Brands that many people know and love, including Nike, Starbucks, Microsoft and Bank of America all donated money to these companies.

The program gave us the opportunity to deep-dive into a topic of our choosing and allowed us to broaden our knowledge and analytical skills. Researching and creating this project also gave me a greater craving for justice.

I highly encourage any students who are interested to apply for the program and attend.

It is held annually in June and is open to all undergraduate students, including students who have just graduated from their senior year.

La Salle Attendees via Maya Martin

Exploring and Bridging Nations: Travel Study to Washington, D.C

Commentary

Isabella Teti, Editor

Since late January, students in La Salle University’s “U.S. Foreign Policy & Haiti” class, taught by Dr. Mark Thomas, have spent the semester preparing for the trip of a lifetime. However, not without first understanding the significance behind the reason for our journey.

As participants in this class, we studied Haiti’s political and governmental conditions, which have become nothing short of tragic. The people of Haiti are suffering immensely, living under the constant threat of gang violence, human rights violations and widespread food insecurity. By examining the effects of a full governmental collapse, our class was able to discuss not only what the United States is doing to help, but also brainstorm our own solutions to the overall crisis.

Through both textbook study and in-depth class discussions, we developed a well-rounded understanding of Haiti’s situation, equipping us to advocate for the country during our travel study experience.

Our travel study took place over La Salle’s spring break and was nothing short of unforgettable. We visited some of the nation’s most beautiful and significant landmarks, including the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, the Capitol Building, the Pentagon and Arlington National Cemetery. We also visited the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building where we met with the staff of Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), and the U.S. House’s Longworth Building where we spoke with the staff of Representative Dwight Evans (D-PA). We discussed the situation in Haiti and learned about their efforts to develop a plan of action. Both offices shared their insights and allowed our class to offer our perspectives and propose potential solutions for U.S. involvement. One of the most exciting moments of the trip was touring the Capitol and receiving passes from Representative Evans’ office to visit the House of Representatives gallery.

Another highlight was our visit to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, where we were briefed by Think Tank staff who have been studying Haiti’s economic and political conditions for many years. This experience offered a different perspective than our meetings on Capitol Hill. We also had the privilege of meeting the Ambassador of Kenya to the United States, David Kerich. He and his staff provided detailed information about Kenya’s peacekeeping missions in Haiti, explaining how their country is helping to reduce violence and restore security. We were able to ask thoughtful questions and learn about both the progress and challenges they’ve encountered.

One of my favorite experiences was touring the Pentagon. We explored the history of the U.S. military branches and visited the moving 9/11 Memorial where we heard a touching story about one of the heroes who lost their life that day. It was a place I had always wanted to visit, and I’m grateful to have finally experienced it. Later that day, we visited Arlington National Cemetery where we witnessed the Changing of the Guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier—a rare and emotional moment. I was especially honored to see both a male and a female soldier perform the ceremony. We also toured the Holocaust Museum, a place I had long wanted to visit. Though somber, the museum provided extensive insight into both the origins and the aftermath of the Holocaust, far more than I had previously known.

During the trip, we also connected with La Salle alumni working in various government roles, from lawyers to federal agency employees. We even met alumni currently in law school, who offered helpful perspectives on the law school experience—guidance that was particularly valuable to students like myself.

All in all, the trip was a tremendous success. It was educational in the truest sense, as we applied what we learned in class at La Salle to conversations at some of the highest levels of government. This experience proved that La Salle is not only educating us about global issues like Haiti’s crisis, but is also preparing us—as future lawyers, politicians and public servants—to advocate for those who cannot speak for themselves. Through this opportunity, La Salle has shown its dedication to shaping the future of our country with integrity and purpose.

Farewell to The Collegian: What I Found Between the Lines

Commentary

Chude Uzoka-Anofienem, Staff Writer

When I first began writing for The La Salle Collegian, I didn’t know exactly what to expect. I thought I’d string some sentences together, maybe cover a few events, toss in a joke or two and call it a day. What I didn’t anticipate was how deeply this paper would weave itself into my week, my thoughts and, most unexpectedly, my sense of purpose.

Writing for a student newspaper isn’t glamorous. You’re not chasing Pulitzers or making headlines across the country. But The Collegian was never about that. It was about something much quieter—and in many ways, more important. It was about community. It was about giving voice to student concerns, celebrating achievements that might otherwise go unnoticed and capturing what it feels like to be part of La Salle University.

I remember my first article vividly. It was about Elon Musk purchasing Twitter and turning it into a complete hell site. I agonized over every word, double-checking facts, trying to strike the right tone, writing from my own perspective. When it finally went live, I refreshed the page more times than I care to admit, wondering if anyone would even read it. Someone did. A classmate stopped me after a lecture and said, “Hey, I read your Elon Musk article. That was cool.” That two-second exchange gave me more confidence than a dozen English classes in middle and high school ever could.

From there, I found my rhythm. I wrote about things that interested me, straying away from the typical school newspaper topics related to campus issues and towards more broader stories filtered through a La Salle lens. Some topics were fun and breezy—ranking the best and worst songs released in a given year. Others were more serious, like examining the WWE’s less than stellar reputation. Whatever the subject, I tried to write with empathy and curiosity. If there was one thing The Collegian taught me, it was how to listen—really listen—to people and their stories.

Of course, none of this happened in a vacuum. The editorial team was the engine behind the whole operation—smart, driven, slightly sleep-deprived people who made magic happen on deadline week after week. They held the bar high, but always with grace and humor. I owe every polished article to an editor who pushed me to my best.

Now, as I write this final piece, I feel the kind of bittersweet gratitude that comes with leaving something meaningful behind. I’m proud of the words I’ve written, but even more so, I’m thankful for the experience itself—for the friendships, the late-night brainstorming sessions, the thrill of seeing my byline and the hundreds of tiny moments that made The Collegian feel like home.

To everyone who read, responded or rolled their eyes at my work—thank you. You made me a better writer, and a more thoughtful person. And to future writers picking up where I leave off: write boldly, edit kindly and never underestimate the impact of your words.

Goodbye for now—but the story always continues.

Letter to La Salle

Commentary

Andrew Noel, Editor

I don’t know why, but as a kid, I used to always think about college. It seemed like, to me at least, a far away place that I may never get to. As I write this, I am three weeks away from graduating. Calling the feeling “weird” would be an understatement.

When I was picking which college to go to, I knew I was making a big choice. I just didn’t realize how big of a choice I was making and how much, for the better, it would impact my life. Given that I am so close to graduating, I’ve done a lot of reflecting on the last four years. It’s perhaps no surprise that I’ve had a lot of mixed emotions this semester, with the main one being thankful.

I’m thankful for La Salle, for challenging me both inside and outside the classroom, and forcing me to grow as a person.

I’m thankful for my professors–namely Dr. Brian Wyant, Dr. Kathleen Bogle and Dr. Caitlin Taylor–all of whom made my experience as a criminal justice major a good one. I always knew that they had my back and only ever wanted to see me succeed. One of the many things I learned in college was how impactful professors can be, and I will be forever grateful for the support and encouragement they showed me along the way.

A few weeks ago, I was watching the NCAA men’s hockey national championship broadcast. The announcer calling the game said that the best part of college is the friends that you make for life. Now that this journey is so close to being over, I can’t agree anymore with that statement. La Salle has given me a lot of good things, but the best thing is without a doubt the friends I will have for the rest of my life.

When I was picking which school to attend, I had a lot of options. Yet, I think it’s safe to say that I hit the jackpot. I can only hope that everyone finds their college experience as fulfilling and life changing as I did.

So that’s it. The quickest and best four years of my life are over. While I’m excited for the future, I will certainly miss La Salle and be indebted for everything it has given me.